-
Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey held that precedent
No CommentsRecently, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey held that precedent.
The case involved injuries sustained when the plaintiff was seriously injured while attempting a jump on its new extreme sport vehicle (ATV) off-road. The owner’s manual warned against jumping. The vehicle also had warning labels on it, even though the jumps are not specifically mentioned on the labels.
Expert for the plaintiff expressed the opinion that the risk of injury from jumping was so great that the label should contain specific warnings against the practice.
The trial court issued a summary trial, the manufacturer of ATV, since the expert found no factual basis for his opinion.
The plaintiff appealed.
You decide: Is it not an expert authorized to give his opinion to a jury without restriction?
The Appellate Division upheld the decision of the trial judge in favor of the manufacturer. Without an adequate explanation of the factual basis, the expert’s conclusions were simply a ‘net’ opinion and inadmissible. Without such evidence, the plaintiff’s case could not succeed.
The Court of Appeal held that experts must be qualified by experience and / or education. Others, however, they must demonstrate that their opinion is not only personal, but is a reliable standard acceptable in the field. In this case, the expert should identify factual information or statistics on the risks associated with the jump if the magnitude of risk could be objectively identified. In addition, the expert did not give any government standards or industry, which have been violated by the warning label that has been used.
The decision emphasizes that the courtroom can do justice and may be the only way to protect your rights. Our Law Firm title = “> Law Firm knows courtrooms, we have exploited the power of law in the courts of justice to our customers for decades in the Alps, Allendale, Ridgewood, Paramus, Upper Saddle River and in Bergen County, Clifton, Ringwood, Passaic, Little Falls and elsewhere in the county of Passaic, Bloomfield, Caldwell, Roseland, Cedar Grove, Belleville and Essex County, Berkeley Heights, Clark, Cranford and Elizabeth in Union County, in Whippany, Montville, Jefferson, Mendham and Chatham and Parsippany in Morris County, Linden, Kenilworth, Plainfield and Cranford in Union County, in Atlantic Highlands, Belmar and Avon County of Monmouth, in Kearny, Bayonne, Union City and North Bergen in Hudson County, in Cranbury, and New Brunswick in Middlesex County, in Hightstown, Hamilton Township, Annandale in Princeton Mercer County and the State of New Jersey and New York City. Please contact us to discuss how we can help you in a new trial or to provide a “second opinion” on your pending lawsuit. There is no obligation initial consultation.
The New Jersey Law Firm and its lawyers are dedicated to results-based client and the protection of individual rights and commercial interests. For 40 years the firm has been recognized for his legal judgments, laws on immigration, real estate, litigation, contracts and education to meet the transactional needs of both individuals and corporate clients. If you need help with business or corporate training and operations, or you seek legal advice on insurance defense, arbitrations, unfair dismissal, title bad practice” malpractice, discrimination , injury “personal injury,” environmental issues, bankruptcy, insurance, civil rights and alternatives in other cases, the firm has global experience, foresight, skill and talent to help you protect your assets and investment interests. The New Jersey Law Firm is very dedicated, motivated, experienced, lawyers / attorneys and effective legal professionals are always here to help.
Random Posts
Published under: Opinion of expert witnesses; Tagged as: extreme sport vehicle, The case involved injuries, The risk of injury
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
